The publication of the GPT-4O images generation function triggered a provocative question: what happens to the NFT when AI can reproduce an artistic style on demand? Download an NFT image, type an prompt like “Ghibli-Inpirated Studio” or “Cyberpunk Transformation”, and the tool reinvents it instantly. Do you want to transform the avatar of your crypto wallet into an Azuki style character? Do. But while AI democratizes access to formerly exclusive visual aesthetics, the NFT ecosystem faces an existential crossroads. Will the style itself become the new battlefield for property and value?
Ownership style
For years, NFTs have drawn their value from Provable scarcity and community -based identity. Projects like cryptopunks and the annoyed monkey yacht club relied on features generated by algorithm to create limited edition “unique” assets, integrating them with share capital. But GPT-4O's ability to clone and remix the styles calls into question this model. Could we go to a time when Style property becomes the proposal for a fundamental value?
Take Azuki, whose profile photos inspired by the anime have become a cultural stenography for web3 cool. Today, anyone can enter the “Azuki style” in an AI tool, download any image and generate passable mimicry. Although this feeds virality focused on the memes, it also dilutes exclusivity which has once supported the price of the Azuki soil. According to BITSCRunch data, the Azuki floor price fell 44% compared to its 2024 peak, reflecting decreases in the main PFP projects. However, the disruptive power of the AI could also catalyze innovation. Could the NFT pivot static art to Owner styleslicensed and monetized like digital patents?
Utility vs speculation
NFT trading volumes tell a story that gives thought. A brief resurgence at the end of 2023, driven by the Bitcoin -based media, gave way to stagnation. In March 2025, the monthly volumes had decreased to $ 110 million, largely supported by projects offering tangible advantages: real awards, game integrations or hypergaded communities.
This underlines a critical truth: when AI can reproduce aesthetics without effort, the NFT must offer something Beyond pixels. Think of offline experiences, public playing services or governance rights linked to DAO. The speculative bubble broke out. What remains are the projects delivered single human value– Irreplicable community obligations or real impact.
Static assets with dynamic co-creation
GPT-4O is not only a threat; He is a collaborator. While the “dynamic NFT” have been theorized since 2021, the IA tools now make them possible. Imagine the NFT which evolve according to the entry of the support: the style of a PFP moves with the trends, each iteration recorded on the chain as a horodis “version”. This transforms the NFT of JPEG frosted into living artefacts, with ownership stories that deepen emotional and financial investment.
But that raises thorny questions. If AI trains on blockchain data accessible to the public, which “has” a style? Projects can patent specific aesthetics, arousing legal wars. Alternatively, open source communities could democratize style libraries, by rewarding creators through fees. In any case, the future of NFTS is based on the balance of control with creativity.
NFTS as a meta-usal containers
In the long term, NFT can completely lose their dependence on visual art. Instead, they could act as Multifunctional keys—The maintenance rights on musical flows, access to events or content generated by AI. For example, NFT music could grant holders partial control over the art of the album, while locking sources of income to the original token. Rarity would pass from pixels to PROVABLE Participation: Community roles, narrative influence or exclusive collaborations.
In this vision, the NFT becomes ships for human connection, not just the code. When the style is commodity, the value flows to those who promote belonging, creativity and shared narration. GPT -4O did not kill NFTS – he forced them to grow.
