A growing concern has struck the BTC space as a new update of Bitcoin Core, the software that feeds most of the nodes in the upper part, is questioned by key developers. The proposed change, which will affect the way transactions are shared on the network, attracts strong reactions. Many believe that if it is adopted, it could threaten the heart of Bitcoin.
The controversial update of the Bitcoin kernel
Jason Hughes, a voice respected in the BTC development space, recently raised an alarm On a traction request on the Bitcoin kernel. This change would affect the transaction relay policy.
It concerns the way in which unconfirmed transactions move in the system before being recorded on the blockchain.
Hughes warned that he could let the Giga -Cottes de Data Non Bitcoin go through the network if they were approved. This would increase the size of the blockchain and make individual nodes more difficult to follow. This could also lead to slower transactions.
Hughes described this Bloat blockchain problem, which is far from the original intentions of Satoshi Nakamoto. In its opinion, this type of data overload can remove bitcoin from its original design in currency. Rather, he urged the community to consider Bitcoin nodes, a more strict version of the software maintained by Luke Dashjr.
According to Hughes, this version does not allow such loose transactions management and better protect the network. He also called cryptography mine Giants like Antpool and Viabtc to reject the update to preserve the Bitcoin function.
Community stakeholders react
Another long -standing developer, Peter Todd responded to the debate on X. He pointed out that, although more conservative Bitcoin nodes still authorize spam type transactions inside the blocks.
Todd suggested that a gentle fork, a compatible network change behind, could be the only way to block non -financial data on the blockchain. He recommended new rules allowing only valid hash digestions or public keys in transactions.
This would make unwanted data stronger on the chain, because it would now be with a calculation cost.
However, he admitted that it would not stop all spam, especially those linked to the chopper trades. Some developers, such as Antoine Poinsot, did not agree, arguing that the question was overestimated.
Bitcoin and institutional adoption: is centralization at risk?
This conversation occurs as are large institutions show greater interest in Bitcoin. Earlier this week, Microstrategy bought 15 355 BTC For $ 1.42 billion, a move that other companies have also adopted.
While many are hosting the stability of institutional money, others fear that it will give more control to a few players.
The promise of decentralization of Bitcoin could be weakened if only a small group of companies make key decisions, software updates to mining operations. The recent debate on the Bitcoin kernel underlines the importance of keeping the fundamental values of the network even if it gains in popularity.
Godfrey Benjamin
Benjamin Godfrey is a blockchain enthusiast and journalists who are enjoying writing on the actual applications of blockchain technology and innovations to stimulate general acceptance and global integration of emerging technology. His desires to educate people on cryptocurrencies inspire his contributions to the media and sites based on renowned blockchain. Benjamin Godfrey is a lover of sport and agriculture. Follow him X,, Liendin
Warning: The content presented may include the author's personal opinion and is subject to the market state. Do your market studies before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
✓ Share: