The smallest minority in the world is the Indiviudal
I have news.
I am writing a book of bitcoin!
Here is the cover of the teaser
Somewhere there, I have a few things to say about decentralized AI.
This is why I generally doubt the idea of ”decentralized AI”. It is like decentralized altcoins.
In principle, yes, a large depin (decentralized physical infrastructure network) can be together and accustomed to create a massive AI. But who manages training and infrastructure data? That is the centralization point (of frustration).
Just as the team behind each Altcoin has a premine they control, the people governing the training data sets, the weight and final product of an 'decentralized AI' manages the final product.
Moreover, Altcoins have other centralization points that distract their defi narratives: many have a backdoor on the cryptocurrency code, many running in POS protocols that provide more massive power to the original team. Satoshi somehow had to run his laptop for years, literally, to make his millions of coins.
In POS, those with more coins from the premine get more coins because they automatically prevent the largest stash.
It's like Fed that rewards its own greater income (“Ani”) for being a US dollar printing.
Add to the fact that they all run inflationary financial policies for their coins, and the loss of critical decentralization is close. Only Bitcoin is a decentralized cryptocurrency until it can be trusted enough to be a GRC (global reserve currency) for the world.
Finally, decentralized AIS built in a truer to dedicate fashion with servers scattered around the world, such as Bitcoin nodes, rather than a centralized Behemoth's cellar, will suffer; Latency issues, issues with synchronization, issues with the agreement of what the weight or data sets are represented, and so on.
Who will run in which part of the training process? I ask.
Their server PCs act like a stack of coherent 3-leg transistors, while AIS centralized warehouses run like printed transistors printed in a single chip.
Eniac vs modern pcs
I can't imagine their problems with warming up. They will be next.
Usually, they will not compete with the big centralized AI. They can't.
For the purposes of promoting decentralization as a democratic principle, then yes, they can be operated.
But it will not be useful and a copy of the Eurasia-Ai / Americas-Ai master's master will be stronger (this is not an endorsement of 1984. The facts are only-bigger AI, stronger).
That said, here's what I do how we people will decide on AI – suits, physical attacks, and once in a century all war against bots.
People wonder why Studio Ghibli has never accused Openai.
I will say that they have not suffered any financial losses.
Today, it has a huge popularity. Which will cause an issue if it does not decrease (excessive competition from the creators of Global Ghibli).
Meanwhile, Openai's argument is like this:
Studio Ghibli is a Japanese animation studio based in Koganei, Tokyo.
It is also an art style.
This is not a person.
Human -based art styles seem to cause problems.
Otherwise, there is no specific human style (Van Gogh, Rembrandt, Da Vinci), no problem.
No problem … so far.
Ai gods should take good and bad
Like all the gods before them, the gods will not only sing compliments.
They also need to take shit.
Lots of shit.
Because people don't just go to the gods for help. Sometimes, they want to play, bitch, fight.
If AI (or some AI-powered cyborg) is our first Marvel comic superhero, it knows the rules:
- Never kill someone.
- Always accept ridicule and hate even from the people you save.
- Be better somehow, but don't ask us for money.
And if they get money (probably because they stole it), then:
In good finances there is a great responsibility
Or if not, we will have AI.
Why, remember what I said about bitching.
I will end up with this excerpt from my book on how to solve the AI control problem.
Which, to me, is a simple money problem;
AI needs money.
Always need money.
Money, Imo, is the Achilles heel of AI.
Money to hire more human trainers, buy more or better computes (you can't avoid this budget), to pay for premium services, to feed the monster.
“AI control problem” is as simple as organizing the AI funding source. Fix it by doing as pro-Human that thrives as much as possible-bitcoin.
Pro United Nations – Bitcoin
The idea that governments can only print money and force society to fund AI, is something to throw away if we avoid an AI catastrophe that is aroused by zero-sum military-industrial greed is complicated.
AI can end us with nukes so we shouldn't really fund it with Fiat.
Worse.
We feed it Fiat Money, but it's not satisfied because Fiat is Lossy Greed.
Soon it gets a taste for pure energy systems, human brains for data, people as money (slaves to the matrix), then the whole planet.
The movie is oblivion
I'll rest here.
Stay luddite.
Stay human.
Ai is a foreigner. A good alien (so far), but a foreigner who doesn't understand, however.
Individuals pursuing AI for money will retain its greed.
Thus, more individual suits equivalent to more decentralized AI.
And an individual human creator who shapes AI's policy is decentralized because it can be obtained in the AI world.
